Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

Interview with Dr. Hugh Simon Lam - Heavy Metal Exposure and Its Impact in Early Child Development

Interview with Dr. Hugh Simon Lam - Heavy Metal Exposure and Its Impact in Early Child Development

We recently had the privilege to speak with Dr Hugh Simon Lam, Associate Professor in the Department of Paediatrics at The Chinese University of Hong Kong. During the interview, Dr Lam reviewed the types of heavy metal exposure affecting the Hong Kong population, and discussed the potential link between heavy metal exposure and neurodevelopmental outcomes. This article presents highlights from the interview.

  • Prenatal heavy metals exposure of mothers and infants in Hong Kong
  • Practical tips on clinical assessment and dietary advices
16 min read


Dr Hugh Simon LAM
Department of Paediatrics
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Prince of Wales Hospital
Shatin, Hong Kong



Heavy metals are naturally occurring metallic elements with high atomic weight and relatively high density. Their multiple industrial, agricultural, domestic, medical and technological applications have led to their ubiquitous distribution in the environment. Even though there is a lack of consensus as to what constitutes a "heavy metal", this term has recently been used to describe metals and semi-metals with no known physiological benefits and with the potential to cause toxicity to humans and the environment. Lead, cadmium and mercury are prime examples of such "toxic metals". These systemic toxicants are known to induce multiple organ damage even at lower levels of exposure, and are of public health significance.1




Heavy metal contamination largely derives from anthropogenic sources. In general, humans are exposed to heavy metals through inhalation of air pollutants or vapour near emission sources; consumption of contaminated drinking water; and contact with contaminated soils, industrial waste, commercial products, or contaminated food.1 Food sources such as vegetables, grains, fruits, fish and shellfish can become contaminated by accumulating heavy metals from surrounding soil and water.2

Mercury occurs in several forms, including elemental mercury, methylmercury and inorganic mercury. Elemental mercury, or metallic mercury, is used in a variety of industrial or manufacturing processes, and in medical devices, such as dental amalgams, sphygmomanometers and thermometers. Since elemental mercury can be vapourized at room temperature, it can also be inhaled and absorbed via the lungs.3

Organic mercury, or methylmercury (MeHg), is one of the most common heavy metals that can be readily absorbed through ingestion.3 The principal source of human exposure to MeHg is the consumption of contaminated fish. Large predatory fish, such as tuna, king mackerel and swordfish, have been shown to contain a high bioconcentration of MeHg (Figure 1). Although the dominant health concerns arise from gestational exposure to MeHg, infants may also be exposed postnatally to MeHg from breast milk should their mothers consume fish or foodstuffs that contain high levels of MeHg.4

Figure 1. Mercury content of regularly consumed fish by Hong Kong mothers

Hugh Simon LAM1

Unpublished data, Department of Paediatrics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong


Exposure to inorganic mercury compounds, elemental mercury or vapourless mercury is less common as compared with that to MeHg.4 Nonetheless, cosmetic soaps and skin-lightening creams that contain inorganic mercury compounds or mercury salts are reportedly still being produced in several countries.3 These compounds are absorbed through the skin across the epidermis, as well as via sweat glands, sebaceous glands and hair follicles. 5,6


The principal source of human exposure to methylmercury is the consumption of contaminated fish, particularly large, predatory fish

Lead has been used in the production of fuel, batteries, paints and ceramic glazes, as well as in solder used in water distribution pipes and food cans. The main source of lead dispersing into the environment (ie, air and soil) is atmospheric lead that results from the use and combustion of leaded fuels. Even though the use of lead in various industries has already been or are in the process of being phased out due to tighter regulatory control, lead poisoning still remains a significant health problem.7

Besides leaded fuel and paint, other sources of lead exposure include contaminated food from lead-soldered cans, contaminated water from lead-soldered pipes, lead-based ceramic, porcelain glaze and cigarette smoke.7 Since lead pipes and fittings are not used in the plumbing systems in Hong Kong, tap water is not a significant source of lead exposure in this region.8

Cadmium exposure is encountered in industries dealing with pigment, metal plating, some plastics and batteries. Exposure to cadmium in humans occurs predominantly through the ingestion of contaminated foodstuffs, especially grains, cereals, leafy vegetables, seafood and offal. Cigarette smoke and incineration of waste containing plastics and nickel-cadmium batteries can result in increased airborne exposure to cadmium.7


Return to top



Acute heavy metal toxicity is often a result of occupational exposure and is rarely from dietary exposure. Acute effects include increased occurrence of lymphocytic aneuploidy, discolouration of front surface of lens of the eyes, insomnia, tremors and hyperexcitability.9 Chronic heavy metal toxicity is generally manifested as a continuum of symptoms and effects, which depends on the nature of the metal, dose, duration of exposure and the underlying health status of the exposed individual (Table 1).7,10


Table 1. Typical presentations of heavy metal toxicity11

Heavy metal

Acute toxicity

Chronic toxicity


Inhalation of oxide fumes: Pneumonitis

Proteinuria, lung cancer, osteomalacia


Nausea, vomiting, encephalopathy (headache, seizures, ataxia, obtundation) Encephalopathy, anaemia, abdominal pain, nephropathy, paralysis


Inhalation of mercury vapour: Fever, vomiting, diarrhoea

Ingestion of inorganic mercury salts: Caustic gastroenteritis
Nausea, metallic taste, gingivostomatitis, tremor, neurasthenia, nephritic syndrome, hypersensitivity


Lead exposure in children and adults can cause a wide spectrum of health problems, ranging from subtle effects on the metabolism (eg, myalgia, paraesthesia, fatigue) and cognition (eg, poor concentration, irritability) at lower but more chronic levels, to seizures, paralysis, renal impairment, gastrointestinal disturbances at higher levels of acute exposure (≥25 µg/dL in children and ≥40 µg/dL in adults).7

Exposure to toxic levels of mercury has profound effects on the central nervous system (CNS) and can be rapidly fatal. High levels of mercury exposure through, for example, inhalation of mercury vapours, can lead to life-threatening injuries to the neurological system. In adults, symptom onset starts with sensory disturbance, followed by visual field constriction, ataxia, cognitive decline and death. At lower but more chronic levels of exposure, the typical constellation of symptoms – erethism (eg, irritability, excitability and excessive shyness), tremor and gingivitis – can arise.7,10



The toxicity of heavy metals most commonly involves the brain and kidney. A considerable amount of literature on the neurotoxic effects of mercury has shown that it can penetrate and damage the blood-brain barrier very rapidly, leading to a dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier system. Mercury irreversibly inhibits and interferes with selenoenzyme functions, which serve to prevent and reverse oxidative damage in the brain and neuroendocrine system. Furthermore, mercury also inhibits the process of myelination of neurons and can lead to direct neurological impairment. In infants, mercury can impair neuronal migration during the development of the CNS even at low doses (0.1–1.0 mg/kg/day), causing adverse long-term neurocognitive effects.12
Lead is a potent neurotoxic agent that impairs enzyme function by binding to the sulphydryl groups and competitively displacing other essential metals, such as calcium and zinc.13 Furthermore, it also interferes with neurotransmitter release and impairs neurological function.14

Return to top



The provisional tolerable weekly intake of MeHg, stipulated by the Joint Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), is 1.6 µg/kg body weight, an amount that is considered sufficiently low to protect the developing fetus.15 Mercury exposure can be quantified by the mercury content in hair, blood and urine (Table 2). Hair mercury levels can reflect chronic exposure at various time points, depending on the portion of hair that is being analyzed, whereas blood mercury levels are useful in determining acute exposure. Mercury levels in cord blood serve as a biomarker for prenatal MeHg exposure during the third trimester of pregnancy. Since mercury can also accumulate in the kidneys, urinary mercury levels help to detect recent inorganic mercury exposure. Urine mercury concentrations over 10 µg/L indicate that a person has been exposed to higher mercury levels than the average population.16

  Table 2. Guidance levels for mercury concentrations in hair, blood and urine3


Hg in blood (µg/L)

Hg in urine (µg/L)

Hg in urine (µg/g creatinine)

Hg in hair(µg/kg/day)

Human bio-monitoring (HBM) threshold limits





HBM I (alert value)

5 7 5 -

HBM II (action level)

15 25 20 -

US EPA benchmark

- - - 0.1

EPA, Environmental Protection Agency; Hg, mercury


Return to top



Besides individuals who live or work in or near an environment where exposure to heavy metals is prevalent, numerous epidemiological studies have also demonstrated that children and fetuses appear to be particularly vulnerable to the neurotoxic effects of heavy metals, even at low levels (0.1–1.0 mg/kg/day).17,18 Children absorb a higher proportion of an ingested dose of inorganic lead salts compared with adults, and are more prone to developmental delays secondary to lead toxicity.11,19 In addition, the fetal brain is especially vulnerable to damage from exposure to MeHg, which readily crosses the placenta and appears in breast milk. Prenatal exposure to MeHg, via the maternal diet, may also result in diffuse CNS damage and disruption of cellular migration in the developing brain, leading to adverse neurocognitive consequences.23


Children and fetuses appear to be particularly vulnerable to the neurotoxic effects of heavy metals


Return to top



Low-dose prenatal MeHg exposure has been suggested to give rise to long-term adverse neurocognitive effects.21 In Hong Kong, MeHg exposure is largely the result of high and steady fish consumption.22 Prenatal MeHg exposure levels in Hong Kong are relatively low compared with other high fish-eating communities globally, and this is attributed to the low MeHg concentration found in commercially available fish. However, its adverse effects on infants can still be observed. In a follow-up study of an original cohort of mother-infant pairs in Hong Kong, in which infant cognitive outcomes were determined via a visual sequencing task and subtests for verbal memory, high cord blood mercury concentration was associated with deficits in long-term neurocognitive outcomes. As evidenced, despite low levels of maternal MeHg exposure, adverse neurocognitive outcomes, albeit mild, are still possible.23


Local data has indicated a small correlation between cord blood mercury concentration and deficits in neurocognitive outcomes, despite low levels of maternal MeHg exposure

Return to top



Eczema is a recurrent disease known to affect the quality of life (QoL) of children, independent of disease severity. In view of the increasing incidence of childhood eczema in developing countries, several environmental and hygiene factors have been identified. To address whether fish sensitization was associated with fish consumption behaviour, eczema severity and blood heavy metal levels, a local study was carried out in 119 eczematous and 43 non-eczematous children, among whom there were no differences in average weekly fish consumption and blood mercury levels. While blood mercury levels correlated with fish consumption behaviour (Table 3), there was, however, no correlation between fish consumption behaviour, eczema severity, QoL and heavy metal levels, and fish sensitization in atopic eczema patients.24

Table 3. Correlation between blood trace element levels and fish consumption19

Metals Freshwater fish Seawater fish
Correlation coefficient p value Correlation coefficient p value
Zinc 0.005 0.95 -0.072 0.38
Mercury 0.17 0.042 0.24 0.004
Manganese -0.14 0.085 0.13 0.13
Arsenic 0.17 0.043 0.38 p<0.001


Furthermore, a cross-sectional analysis was carried out to assess whether QoL and eczema severity are associated with abnormal serum levels of heavy metals in children in Hong Kong. This analysis elucidated that it was not mercury levels, but rather serum lead levels that positively correlated with poor QoL, disease severity, eosinophil count and log-transformed immunoglobulin E.25

Return to top



Although chelation therapy is used to treat acute heavy metal poisoning, much controversy surrounds chelation therapy for mercury and heavy metal poisoning in Hong Kong. The treatment is empirical, expensive and is offered by only a few local private physicians. To date, there is no evidence that chelation therapy is useful for low-dose mercury poisoning, nor are there official guidelines to support its use.

Despite low-dose mercury exposure being common in Hong Kong, acute high-dose poisoning is uncommon. A thorough fish intake assessment can, therefore, help practitioners to detect mercury exposure. As a preventive measure to decrease the risk of prenatal mercury exposure, pregnant women should be advised to consume appropriate amounts, that is up to 12 ounces or two average meals a week, of fish and/or shellfish that are low in mercury.26 That being said, drastic reductions in fish consumption may not be beneficial and careful nutritional considerations are necessary to reap the dietary benefits of fish while minimizing the risk of fetal exposure to heavy metals.

With regard to lead exposure and toxicity, parents should receive guidance about intervention, as well as optimal nutrition. Nutritional intervention should aim to reduce gastrointestinal absorption of ingested lead, which includes iron and calcium supplementation, thorough washing of leafy vegetables during food preparation, a balanced diet with moderate intake of food items that have high lead content (eg, lime-preserved eggs and shellfish), as well as frequent meals.8,27


To decrease the risk of prenatal mercury exposure, pregnant women should be advised to consume up to 12 ounces or two average meals a week of fish and/or shellfish that are low in mercury

Return to top



  • Since mercury exposure tests are not routinely carried out in clinics and hospitals, assessing fish intake, such as the type and size of fish, can provide a sufficiently good idea of mercury exposure risk in susceptible patients.
  • Pregnant women in Hong Kong should be advised to choose freshwater fish over marine fish in order to reap the benefits of dietary fish while limiting the risk of increasing foetal MeHg exposure.
  • Although low-dose mercury exposure is common in Hong Kong, acute high-dose mercury poisoning is rare. In the absence of the regular assessment of individuals, putting in place public health measures should be encouraged to reduce the exposure of high-risk populations (eg, women of childbearing age and young children) to mercury.
  • There is no indication for chelation of low-level, chronic MeHg poisoning. When confronted with a patient who has suspected symptomatic mercury intoxication, it is critical to consult your local poison centre or clinical toxicologist for guidance on whether chelation treatment is advised.
  • Instead of strict seafood avoidance, pregnant and lactating women and children should be advised about the risks and benefits of fish consumption, indicating the type of fish that may be eaten and frequency of consumption.

Return to top



Heavy metal exposure is ubiquitous and can have a lasting effect on health across the life course. In this regard, early intervention through public education is necessary to prevent toxic exposure and ensure long-term health and outcomes. Equally important are evidence-based recommendations for preventing harmful environmental exposure and public health measures that must be put in place to reduce heavy metal exposure and cultivate informed consumer-purchasing patterns.

Return to top


  1. Tchounwou PB, et al. Heavy metal toxicity and the environment. EXS 2012;101:133-164.
  2. Physicians for Social Responsibility. Heavy Metals. In: Confronting Toxics. Available at: Assessed 31 October 2013.
  3. Bose-O'Reilly S, et al. Mercury exposure and children's health. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2010;40(8):186-215.
  4. Davidson PW, et al. Mercury exposure and child development outcomes. Pediatrics 2004;113(4 Suppl):1023-1029.
  5. Chan TY. Inorganic mercury poisoning associated with skin-lightening cosmetic products. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2011;49(10):886-891.
  6. Park JD, Zheng W. Human exposure and health effects of inorganic and elemental mercury. J Prev Med Public Health 2012;45(6):344-352.
  7. Hu H. Human Health and Heavy Metals Exposure. In: Life Support: The Environment and Human Health. McCally M, eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2002 .
  8. Centre for Food Safety. Lead Exposure in Our Everyday Life. In: Food Safety Focus; 2007. Available at: Accessed 31 October 2013.
  9. Centre for Food Safety. Mercury in Fish and Food Safety. In: Risk Assessment Studies Report No. 31; 2008. Available at: Accessed 12 October 2013.
  10. Clarkson TW. The toxicology of mercury. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 1997;34(4):369-403.
  11. Adal A, Wiener SW. Heavy Metal Toxicity. Available at: Accessed 11 October 2013.
  12. National Research Council. Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
  13. Pearson HA, Schonfeld DJ. Lead. In: Rudolph's Pediatrics. Rudolph CD, eds. 21st edition: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2003.
  14. Dart RC, Hurlbut KM, Boyer-Hassen LV. Lead. In: Medical Toxicology. Dart RC, eds. 3rd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004.
  15. World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United States. Joint FAO/WHO expert committee on food additives: Summary and Conclusions; 2003. Available at: Accessed 11 October 2013.
  16. Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry. Toxic Substances Portal: Mercury. Available at: Accessed 11 October 2013.
  17. Karagas MR, et al. Evidence on the human health effects of low-level methylmercury exposure. Environ Health Perspect 2012;120(6):799-806.
  18. Banks EC, et al. Effects of low level lead exposure on cognitive function in children: a review of behavioral, neuropsychological and biological evidence. Neurotoxicology 1997;18(1):237-281.
  19. Hornung RW, et al. Age of greatest susceptibility to childhood lead exposure: a new statistical approach. Environ Health Perspect  2009;117(8):1309-1312.
  20. Choi BH. The effects of methylmercury on the developing brain. Prog Neurobiol 1989;32(6):447-470.
  21. Grandjean P, et al. Cognitive deficit in 7-year-old children with prenatal exposure to methylmercury. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1997;19(6):417-428.
  22. Fok TF, et al. Fetal methylmercury exposure as measured by cord blood mercury concentrations in a mother-infant cohort in Hong Kong. Environ Int  2007;33(1):84-92.
  23. Lam HS, et al. Long term neurocognitive impact of low dose prenatal methylmercury exposure in Hong Kong. Environ Int 2013;54:59-64.
  24. Hon KL, et al. Fish consumption, fish atopy and related heavy metals in childhood eczema. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol  2012;11(3):230-235.
  25. Hon KL, et al. Serum levels of heavy metals in childhood eczema and skin diseases: friends or foes. Pediatr Allergy Immunol  2010;21(5):831-836.
  26. Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry. Toxic Substances Portal: Mercury. Available at: Accessed 21 October 2013.
  27. Papanikolaou NC, et al. Lead toxicity update. A brief review. Med Sci Monit 2005;11(10):RA329-RA336.